Skip to main content

Looking at the NICEHCK Yuandao Earphones

Today I'm taking a look at the NICEHCK Yuandao earphones. I've been using a pair of Sony MDR-E9LP earphones for a long time, and while they're alright, I wanted to see what other options of a similar form factor and price might be out there. 

Check out the video on YouTube for more information and audio samples: 


The NICEHCK earphones up close.

The NICEHCK packaging is pretty simple, not much to it, though it does have some information printed on the back. Inside, you get the earphones and some standard foam ear covers.

Included foam ear covers for the earphones.

Both the NICEHCK and the Sony use a standard TRS connection point. One difference I noticed right away is the connector style. The NICEHCK ones have a straight connector, while the Sony pair I have uses an angled one. For my specific use case, plugging into my computer, the straight style on the NICEHCK is actually preferable.

Comparing the straight TRS connector of the NICEHCK (top) to the angled connector of the Sony (bottom)

Now, let's talk about the cable. I compared the full length of both cables. The Sony cable turned out to be slightly longer than the NICEHCK cable. That was a bit disappointing for me, as I was actually hoping for something longer. I guess I should have paid closer attention to the length specification when I ordered. Of course, you could always use an extension cable if needed (I ended up doing this without issue...).

Caption: Holding up both sets of earphones to compare the overall cable lengths.

Looking at the earphones themselves, the NICEHCK earphone body is noticeably larger than the Sony one.

Earphone sizing.

I decided to do a quick fit test with the NICEHCK and the Sony. I put both earphones in, one in each ear. Then I shook my head around a bit. The Sony earphone actually fell out, while the NICEHCK one stayed securely in place. So, at least for my ears, the physically larger earphone seems better with the NICEHCK.

Let's look at the specs quickly. The Sony packaging claims a frequency range of 18Hz to 22,000Hz. The NICEHCK specifications state a range of 20Hz to 20,000Hz. On paper, the Sony seems to have a slightly wider frequency range.

However, there's a significant difference in driver size. The NICEHCK uses a 15.4mm driver, while the Sony has a 13.5mm driver. That's quite a difference, and you'll notice that from the larger driver in the lower frequencies.

Highlighting the NICEHCK earphone while discussing its 15.4mm driver size.

To get a sense of the sound difference, I did a quick test using an external audio recorder. I played the same audio clip through each set of earphones, placing the earbud right next to the recorder's microphone for each test.

A visual representation of the recorded sound waveforms for both earphones as shown in the video.

So far, based on this initial look, these NICEHCK Yuandao earphones seem pretty nice. They come at a comparable cost and offer a deeper sound profile. My main wish is that the cable were longer. They seem like a decent option if you're looking for basic, budget-friendly earphones.

Holding the NICEHCK Yuandao earphones after the review.

If you want to hear the sound comparison test and see the full review, check out the video version of this on YouTube.

Check out the earphones through my links: 

As an Amazon associate, I earn from qualifying purchases! 

Popular posts from this blog

Reviewing the Thermalright TL-G12 and TL-C14 Fans

I recently picked up a bunch of Thermalright fans for a new PC build, specifically the TL-G12 (120mm) and the TL-C14 (140mm). At the time, they were pretty inexpensive, and the promise of fluid dynamic bearings (FDB) along with PWM control sounded like a great deal on paper, so I bought quite a few of each. In this article and related video I go into detail about their installation and use.  Check out the video on YouTube for a lot more information:  Boxes for the Thermalright TL-G12 and TL-C14 fans. Specifications listed on the TL-G12 fan box. Specifications for the 120mm TL-G12: Speed: 1500 RPM (+/- 10%) Noise: Rated 23.6 dBA or greater. Airflow: Up to 62.6 CFM Connector: 4-pin PWM with a daisy-chain feature. Extras: Includes rubber pads on the corners for vibration dampening and standard case screws. One thing I noticed on the G12 frame is the lack of an airflow direction indicator, but it's a standard fan design, so it's easy enough to figure out. Specifications shown on ...

Working on a second GPU review.

 I might as well start things off here!  I'm working on a second GPU video because I had ended up swapping out the cheap Amazon Warehouse Deals RTX 4060 one for a larger quieter one. I also was able to do 4k tests without a 4k monitor by using the Atomos Ninja V. Starting to look through the results. Here is one in Google Sheets on Affinity Photo 2 using their built-in benchmark.  The ASUS Proart RTX 4060 has a performance and quiet mode which is what the PM and SM data lines mean. So far from what I've seen of the data these two modes don't mean much from a performance standpoint, at least on my old i7-6700 based PC build. It feels like a marketing based feature and I'm probably going to leave the card in quiet mode.  I'm not sure how much of a difference these scores mean in practice between the GTX 1060 and RTX 4060, but the number is larger! haha

Upgrading from GTX 1060 to RTX 4060: Performance Gains in an Older System

(I used Claude AI to generate this article based on my video's transcript, so keep that in mind it might not be perfect even though I've gone through it to correct any issues I see. Also keep in mind that I've done further testing with an ASUS Proart 4060 compared to the MSI 1060 on my old PC and noticed a few situations where the CPU was limiting performance such as FFXIV minimum framerates.) https://youtu.be/yR6XPvt-F0A I recently decided to take a look at the GIGABYTE RTX 4060 low profile version. This was the cheapest RTX 4060 card I could find as an Amazon Warehouse Deal, and I was curious to see if my old computer would benefit from upgrading from a GTX 1060 6GB to this new card. Low profile! My current system is built around an Intel i7-6700 CPU, which is likely to be the main limitation in this comparison. I was particularly interested in the sound profile of this card given its tiny size. I don't take a look in the video, but potential benefits of AV1 encode/d...